虽然，你可能经常骂傻×审稿人，但，有的时候你也需要审稿，然后想到别人也可能这样骂你[笑cry]
这是篇积累素材小博文啦
1.质疑别人的创新性
Please claim the novelty of this work except for the new application in the ×××× system, because the effectiveness of ×××× has been demonstrated in many research works.
I do not see the obvious novelty in the manuscript, which only records some simulation results but lackssupport from new theories. I do not think this manuscript can be published in its present form. （看到这话怕不是会被气死）
Can you explain why such ×××works by simply copying the configuration from ×××, it doesn't work all the time. Is there any requirement that needs to be met to allow such ×××?
The innovation and persuasion may be slightly weak.
The manuscript is not suitable for publication in terms of novelty, significant contribution, and presentation.
2.给出comments前的套话
大修：
I would like to thankthe authors for this well-written letter and for the interesting results that they are showing. I would like to provide them a few comments and ask them some questions before I agree on its publications. Please see them in the attached pdf.
A number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. The comments are as follows:
Thanks for the deeper survey and the answers to the previous comments. But still there's a gap to be a high quality×××paper for the following reasons.
I think a major revision should be performed before it can be considered for publication.
I would like to provide them a few comments before I agree on its publications.
The paper is well written, however, some comments are provided to improve the contribution.
拒稿：
Based on the enclosed set of reviews, this manuscript has beenrejectedfor publication.
I regret not being able to recommend the publication of your manuscript.
In my opinion, the manuscript is not suitable for publication in terms of novelty, significant contribution, and presentation. Here are my comments:
